Papillary Balloon Dilation Versus Intraductal Lithotripsy
common.study.values.description
“Papillary Balloon Dilation Versus Intraductal Lithotripsy”
Our aim is to compare the efficacy, safety, procedural time required, and costs of a strategy initially employing cholangioscopy guided intraductal lithotripsy (laser/electrohydraulic lithtripsy (EHL)) versus a strategy initially using papillary dilation for removal of large bile duct stones.
common.study.values.location
participant.ui.study.affiliations-map.online-study.header-virtual
participant.ui.study.affiliations-map.online-study.text
common.study.values.methods
common.study.methods.has-drugs-no
common.study.methods.is-healthy-no
Procedure - Initial therapy with papillary balloon dilation
patients will first undergo papillary dilation
Procedure - Initial therapy with intraductal lithotripsy
patients will first undergo intraductal laser or electrohydraulic lithrotripsy
participant.views.study.view.additional
participant.views.study.view.scientific-title
Prospective Randomized Trial of Cholangioscopy Guided Intraductal Lithotripsy Versus Papillary Balloon Dilation for the Endoscopic Treatment of Large Bile Duct Stones
common.study.values.clinical-trial-id
NCT03536247
participant.views.study.view.id
7axZld
