common.study.topics.clinical

Papillary Balloon Dilation Versus Intraductal Lithotripsy

common.study.values.description

Papillary Balloon Dilation Versus Intraductal Lithotripsy

Our aim is to compare the efficacy, safety, procedural time required, and costs of a strategy initially employing cholangioscopy guided intraductal lithotripsy (laser/electrohydraulic lithtripsy (EHL)) versus a strategy initially using papillary dilation for removal of large bile duct stones.

common.study.values.location

participant.ui.study.affiliations-map.online-study.header-virtual

participant.ui.study.affiliations-map.online-study.text

participant.ui.study.affiliations-map.legend.locations participant.ui.study.affiliations-map.legend.selected

common.study.values.methods

No pharmaceutical medication involved common.study.methods.has-drugs-no
Patients and healthy individuals accepted common.study.methods.is-healthy-no

Procedure - Initial therapy with papillary balloon dilation

patients will first undergo papillary dilation

Procedure - Initial therapy with intraductal lithotripsy

patients will first undergo intraductal laser or electrohydraulic lithrotripsy

participant.views.study.view.additional

participant.views.study.view.scientific-title

Prospective Randomized Trial of Cholangioscopy Guided Intraductal Lithotripsy Versus Papillary Balloon Dilation for the Endoscopic Treatment of Large Bile Duct Stones

common.study.values.clinical-trial-id

NCT03536247

participant.views.study.view.id

7axZld