common.study.topics.clinical

UKA Manual Versus UKA MAKO Robotic

common.study.values.description

UKA Manual Versus UKA MAKO Robotic

The purposes of this investigation is to 1) To determine if Robotic-arm assisted UKA (RA-UKA) allows for more accurate component placement than manual UKA (MI-UKA)and 2) prospectively assess the learning curve, radiographic, and clinical outcomes of use of the RIO system as it is incorporated into our clinical practice and compare it to historical data on manual UKAs and TKAs.

common.study.values.location

participant.ui.study.affiliations-map.online-study.header-virtual

participant.ui.study.affiliations-map.online-study.text

participant.ui.study.affiliations-map.legend.locations participant.ui.study.affiliations-map.legend.selected

common.study.values.methods

No pharmaceutical medication involved common.study.methods.has-drugs-no
Patients and healthy individuals accepted common.study.methods.is-healthy-no

Device - MAKO Robotic UKA

Prospective UKA patient receiving unilateral knee arthroplasty using the MAKO robotic machine

participant.views.study.view.additional

participant.views.study.view.scientific-title

Post-Market Study of Robotic-Arm Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Comparison to Traditional UKA (Fixed and Mobile Bearings)

common.study.values.clinical-trial-id

NCT03447626

participant.views.study.view.id

9b63zd