common.study.topics.clinical

Biologic Versus Synthetic Mesh for Paraesophageal Hernia

common.study.values.description

Biologic Versus Synthetic Mesh for Treatment of Paraesophageal Hernia

The investigators propose a randomized, single blinded controlled trial to compare the use of synthetic versus biologic mesh in hiatal hernia repair, two currently accepted standard of care surgical modalities. The investigators hypothesize that use of synthetic mesh will have lower recurrence at these time points compared to use of biologic mesh.

common.study.values.location

participant.ui.study.affiliations-map.online-study.header-virtual

participant.ui.study.affiliations-map.online-study.text

participant.ui.study.affiliations-map.legend.locations participant.ui.study.affiliations-map.legend.selected

common.study.values.methods

No pharmaceutical medication involved common.study.methods.has-drugs-no
Patients and healthy individuals accepted common.study.methods.is-healthy-no

Device - Parietexâ„¢ Composite Hiatal Mesh, North Haven, CT

Parietexâ„¢ Composite Hiatal Mesh (North Haven, CT) designed for hiatal hernia repair.

Device - Biodesign™ Surgisis® Graft, Cook Medical, Bloomington

Biodesign™ Surgisis® Graft (Cook Medical, Bloomington) designed for hiatal hernia repair.

participant.views.study.view.additional

participant.views.study.view.scientific-title

Biologic Versus Synthetic Mesh for Treatment of Paraesophageal Hernia

common.study.values.clinical-trial-id

NCT02242526

participant.views.study.view.id

Rb490d