Eligibility Details:
Inclusion Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria for Primary Dysmenorrhea Group: All cases (n=70) will have pain in the
region between the umbilicus and the perineum, above the level of the inguinal ligament,
and rate their average pain greater than or equal to 6/10 (0 = no pain; 10 = worst
imaginable pain) during menses when not using NSAIDs. The investigators will use strict
inclusion criteria and verification with structural MRI to ensure patients with primary
dysmenorrhea most likely do not have endometriosis, leiomyoma, or adenomyosis as described
below. It is not possible to reliably evaluate superficial endometriosis with MRI
(Nisenblat et al., 2016), but suspicious cases for deep infiltrating endometriosis will be
confirmed by the radiologists who routinely evaluate MRIs for our gynecological surgical
service. Although it is impossible to rule out endometriosis without surgery, in select
cases The investigators will use clinical exams and criteria supported by decision trees
(Eskenazi et al., 2001; Chapron et al., 2005, 2011; Vercellini et al., 2007) that suggest
the detection of endometriosis stage 2 or higher would be unlikely (<15%) in this
population. Participants with dysmenorrhea that rate their bowel pain, dyspareunia, or
non-menstrual pelvic pain equal to or greater than 40 on 0-100 visual analog pain scale on
the McGill Pain Questionnaire will be given the option to participate in an additional
clinical exam visit. To reduce the likelihood of comorbid endometriosis, primary
dysmenorrhea participants with symptoms of endometriosis described above, will be required
to have a negative clinical exam and no immediate family history of endometriosis to
qualify for final analyses.
Inclusion Criteria for Leiomyomata Group: The investigators will also study participants
with leiomyomata (n=20) because it is a frequent cause of menstrual pain and will often be
identified in disqualified primary dysmenorrhea participants. Leiomyomata (nondegenerated)
will be diagnosed by foci homogeneously hypointense on T2, but isointense relative to
myometrium on T1 according to standard definitions (Kubik-Huch et al., 2018). To reduce
variability within this category, the investigators will restrict enrollment to small to
medium sized intramural leiomyomata (30 to 150 cm3 combined volume). The investigators
anticipate 10 participants with leiomyomata will be identified from incidental MRI during
this study, while 10 more will be recruited from advertisements and our clinic. A smaller
cohort is studied here because the main purpose of this group is to establish whether the
physiological basis for menstrual pain in women with leiomyomata is significantly different
than women with primary dysmenorrhea. Participants with leiomyomata, who are also
symptomatic with surgically diagnosed endometriosis will be excluded.
Inclusion Criteria for Endometriosis Group: Participants without leiomyomata, but
symptomatic for endometriosis (n=20) will be enrolled before planned surgical excision
(follow-up surgery from an earlier diagnosis). The investigators will confirm a diagnosis
of Stage 2, 3, or 4 endometriosis following surgery. For the patients without confirmed
abnormal surgical findings for endometriosis with dysmenorrhea will be considered as
primary dysmenorrhea cases. Dr. Tu's pelvic pain division performs over 100 laparoscopic
pain evaluations annually (many with deep infiltrating disease) enabling us to characterize
MRI signals in surgically confirmed endometriosis patients. A smaller cohort is studied
here because the main purpose of this group is to establish whether the physiological basis
for menstrual pain in women with endometriosis is significantly different than women with
primary dysmenorrhea.
Inclusion Criteria for Healthy Controls: Healthy control cases (n=20) must rate their
average menstrual pain < =2/10 over that past 6 months (without NSAID use) and have no
other concurrent pain diagnoses or leiomyomata. Their lack of concurrent pain diagnoses
will be confirmed with questionnaires (NIH PROMIS scales, Rome Foundation IBS criteria
(Palsson et al., 2016), AUA bladder pain syndrome criteria (Hanno et. al. 2012), and the
Complex Medical Symptom Inventory (Williams and Schilling, 2009) and a medical exam screen.
Healthy controls and participants with primary dysmenorrhea will be ratio-metrically
age-matched with comparable pregnancy history to ensure similar demographics between
groups.
Exclusion Criteria:
Age restrictions for all study participants: Regularly menstruating women (age 18-45) will
be identified using our well-tested community-wide recruitment strategy, including
approaching our division's busy gynecological disorders clinic, and the departments of
Ob/Gyn at NorthShore and the University of Chicago. Although women above the age of 45 can
have menstrual pain, irregularities in perimenopause could cause confounding effects on
uterine physiology and scheduling difficulty. Similarly, irregularities in menstruation,
ovulation, and pain levels in participants under age 18 could potentially detract from
meaningful interpretation of phenotypes (Seidman et al., 2018). Additionally, before age
18, the uterus is still developing and substantially increasing in size (Porcu et al.,
1989; Verguts et al., 2013). Thus, to limit potential confounding effects, participants
under the age of 18 will be investigated in a separate study.
Menstruation-related exclusion criteria for all study participants: The investigators will
exclude certain participants with conditions associated with the absence of regular menses
such as polycystic ovarian syndrome, pregnancy, current use of any continuous hormonal
medication or contraceptive, or Asherman's syndrome.
MRI-related or participation related exclusion criteria for all study participants:
The investigators will exclude participants with criteria that would affect our ability to
obtaining meaningful MRI data such as
1. presence of an intrauterine device (IUD). The use of an IUD potentially affects
interpretability of MRI because it creates an imaging artifact in the endometrium
extending to the myometrium.
2. inability to read or comprehend the informed consent written in English,
3. history of metallic implants,
4. history of metallic injury,
5. any diagnosed condition that would preclude investigation with MRI (e.g.,
claustrophobia),
6. BMI >40,
7. allergy or inability to tolerate naproxen
Exclusion criteria for known factors that affect the interpretability of the data for all
study participants:
1. thyroid dysfunction,
2. adrenal dysfunction,
3. renal disorders,
4. liver disorders,
5. coagulopathy,
6. prolactinoma,
7. von Willebrand disease,
8. platelet disorders,
9. diabetic neuropathy,
10. gastrointestinal conditions or surgeries that would affect naproxen absorption,
11. active genitourinary or sexually transmitted infection
Provisional exclusion for primary analyses for all study participants: Acute or chronic
conditions associated with pelvic pain with a defined anatomical cause other than
endometriosis or leiomyoma (e.g., pathological ovarian cysts, significant persistent
hydro/hematosalpinx, untreated pelvic inflammatory disease, active pelvic or abdominal
malignancies, Mullerian anomalies, or stage 3 uterine prolapse), and comorbid diagnosis of
significant leiomyoma and endometriosis.
Note: these exclusion criteria may be incidentally discovered after the MRI scan and
confirmed with a radiologist's or Dr. Tu's diagnosis.
Provisional exclusion for adenomyosis group: Because the frequency of adenomyosis is low or
unknown, and may consist of multiple subtypes resulting in heterogeneity and inadequate
statistical power, adenomyosis patients are not a planned study group and diagnosed cases
will be initially excluded from recruitment. Focal and diffuse adenomyosis will be excluded
by guidelines (Chapron et al., 2017) adapted from the Kishi criteria (Kishi et al., 2012):
maximal junctional zone thickness exceeding 12 mm, a ratio of junctional zone thickness to
myometrium exceeding 40%, or high-intensity foci within the myometrium. If a substantial
number of adenomyosis participants participate, as discovered after-the-fact with MRI,
results will be analyzed.
Intermediate levels of dysmenorrhea pain exclusion: Participants with mild menstrual pain
(between 3 and 5 on a 0-10 scale) will be excluded. Our prior experience with this cohort
(Westling et al., 2013) suggests that The investigators may encounter a floor effect when
studying the effectiveness of NSAIDs. Also, since this cohort is most likely to respond to
NSAIDs, it is imperative The investigators study the mechanisms of the most severe
sufferers of refractory menstrual pain.
common.study.methods.has-drugs-yes
common.study.methods.is-healthy-no
