common.study.topics.clinical

Surgical Instruments

common.study.values.description

Single-use Efficiency Instruments With Patient Specific Technique (MyKnee®) Versus Traditional Metal Instruments With Conventional Surgical Technique

To compare economic factors and the rate of adverse events between two types of instrumentation used for total knee replacement: Single-use Efficiency Instruments with Patient Specific Technique (MyKneeAR) Traditional Metal Instruments with Conventional Surgical Technique

common.study.values.location

participant.ui.study.affiliations-map.online-study.header-virtual

participant.ui.study.affiliations-map.online-study.text

participant.ui.study.affiliations-map.legend.locations participant.ui.study.affiliations-map.legend.selected

common.study.values.methods

No pharmaceutical medication involved common.study.methods.has-drugs-no
Patients and healthy individuals accepted common.study.methods.is-healthy-no

Device - Customized patient instruments

Single use efficiency instruments and cutting blocks specifically made for each patient using pre-op MRI or CT scans to make bone cuts and select implant size.

Device - Traditional Metal Instruments

Traditional metal instrument will be used to make bone cuts and size the components in this control group.

participant.views.study.view.additional

participant.views.study.view.scientific-title

A Multi-center, Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Surgical and Economic Parameters of Total Knee Replacement Performed With Single-use Efficiency Instruments With Patient Specific Technique (MyKnee®) Versus Traditional Metal Instruments With Conventional Surgical Technique.

common.study.values.clinical-trial-id

NCT03148379

participant.views.study.view.id

rb2lKe